The book I read was; How to Fail at Almost Everything and Still Win Big by Scott Adams.
1) What was the
general theme or argument of the book?
Adam
addresses and indulges the idea that failure can potentially be a positive
thing—that it is a beneficial aspect of ones climb to the top. When hearing the
words “failure” one is flushed with negative thoughts; however, this does not
always have to be true. Failure can provide us with the opportunity to learn
from our mistakes, to gain experience, all to ensure that we better ourselves.
I guess its true what they say, “we learn from our mistakes”.
2) How did the book,
in your opinion, connect with and enhance what you are learning in ENT 3003?
I definitely connected with the
humor present in the book as this is something Dr. Pryor practices in his
lectures. As I watch to intellectual individuals express themselves with a
humors relief it makes me wonder if there is a pattern. Anyways, I can truly
say that the book enhanced my knowledge and reinforce my course learning, which
I plan to apply to my future endeavors. I took two important points from Adams
book.
First, Adams uses a struck by
lighting analogy and compares this to getting lucky, which basically states
that luck can be manipulated in a way. By stepping outside, or by holding
lighting rods during a thunderstorm, all these factors increase the odds of
getting hit by lighting. Basically, you have control of your actions which
translates to making your own luck. So, go find the “luck”, place yourself in
the storm and remember to keep a positive attitude cause you never know when
lighting might strike.
Lastly, the one I connected with
most was “Passion is overrated”. This was something that stuck with me since I
am a passionate person and find many of times that it drives my behavior. He
states that everyone has a passion, but that “passion” is not what leads to
success. Adams mentions to use factors like energy, information, and a systems
approach to empower yourself in the hunt for success. This is interesting
because it was not something I have considered, sure you know that these
factors are important but sometimes passion can blind you.
3) If you had to design
an exercise for this class, based on the book you read, what would that
exercise involve?
My designed exercise for this
class would be, based on my reading, a series of assignments based on what the
students consider to be their future career, whether it’d be real-estate or
corporate administration. They would
devise a “system approach” on how to move towards their career and make certain
that they state; what would drive them? What platforms or social capital can
they use to gather information? What would drive them? All the meanwhile
excepting passion from the equation.
4) What was your
biggest surprise or 'aha' moment when reading the book? In other words, what
did you learn that differed most from your expectations?
My biggest
surprise had to be Scott Adams background. For over 15 years Scott found himself
in the corporate world before he decided to pursue several rocky business ideas.
To my surprise they all failed, all 36 of them. Yet he never withered, nor did
he call it quits, he got knocked down and right back up all 36 times. Therefore,
Scott is an inspiration—showing us to never quite, to learn from our mistakes,
and to always take action, and to never give up!
Hi Cesar, this book sounds very interesting! I like the idea presented that failure is a good thing, and something that should have a positive view. I like your designed exercise, I believe it would not only educate students but help them discover their potential. Awesome book and ideas!
ReplyDeleteHi Cesar! I actually was considering reading this book before I chose the book I read about social media. I really like how detailed you were with the book connection. I personally like the idea of passion being "overrated" because I find this very interesting since I think passion is very important to have about a company. I like your idea about the class exercise as well. Overall, your post was very good and it seems like you liked the book.
ReplyDeleteHi Cesar, what a great choice! It really sounds like a very nice book. I enjoyed being able to read your reflection on it because it sounds that I have learned a lot through you. I definitely can see how this book can connect with the idea of entrepreneurship since innovative ideas can always have a risk of failure, but this book seemed to show us that there are many ways to overcome failure. Great post!
ReplyDeleteHey Cesar, this sounds like a really interesting book and I enjoyed reading your reflection about it. You were very descriptive in your writing and I was able to learn a lot through this post I felt like. I also found it surprising that all 36 of Scott Adams ideas failed. That just shows how often people fail starting out. The key is to never give up. Great post.
ReplyDeleteHi Cesar. I can tell that you really dove into the ready for this assignment. It is clear that you put a ton of energy into this assignment. I loved the "aha moment" that you chose to talk about; what a great example it is to see someone fail 36 out of 36 times and not give up. The book provided a great lesson. Failure is not something to run from, but rather something to embrace and grow from.
ReplyDeleteHi Cesar, great summary that makes me want to pick up this book, having not chosen it this time around. I really like how the book tells you to create systems in place of what the company values you for, like this author did when he quit the corporate world. I also like how despite the many times his businesses failed, he still took another crack at another one.
ReplyDelete